Helen Casey is tracing the impact of the move of heritage online, as here with the Europeana project, http://www.europeana.eu/portal/ |
Helen Casey is a filmmaker and Director at Magic BeansMedia. She is a second year DHeritage student working on online heritage.
Digital Decisions: The rise of information technology since the turn of the millennium and its effect on heritage professionals and the sectors in which they work
At the turn of the millennium, when the internet was new, it
seemed that, for heritage professionals, a shiny new dawn awaited. Technology
would allow records to be digitised, artefacts to be experienced through
virtual reality, and expertise to be shared worldwide at the touch of a button.
Technology would democratise our heritage, allowing more people to access,
experience and learn from it. At the same time, there were warnings that the
use of gaudy information screens in exhibitions would distract from the object,
immersive technology allowing sensory perception would cheapen and simplify the
visitor experience, and expensive technology used to digitise and share
heritage would become obsolete within ten or even five years, wasting valuable
resources and creating a ‘digital black hole’ where digitised artefacts would
go to die. So, how many of these predictions came to pass? And what can we
learn from the experience of heritage professionals since the turn of the
millennium that could help them plan ahead in a world of rapid and
unpredictable technological change?
The communication of authority and authenticity in scenarios such as this one interests DHeritage student Barbara Wood |
Barbara Wood is a curator at The National Trust. Her doctoral
research examines authenticity, authority and heritage. She is currently in her
first year of study for the DHeritage.
Authenticity, integrity and sharing information or
manipulation of experience, restricting access and managing information? Who has the authority to communicate knowledge
and the power to control experience in the heritage sector?
This research addresses issues which are relevant across the
heritage industry and the historic environment. It will explore who takes
ownership of material and information and consider how this has changed over
time, reflecting the requirements of funders, the expectations of visitors and
the interests of individuals.
The work will consider whether it is possible to engage
directly with heritage or whether experiences are always managed and
manipulated to reflect the interests of individuals or current sectoral objectives.
It will debate on what grounds authority to manage experience is allocated and
will ultimately consider whether that authority is appropriately allocated and
the effect of this delegation on visitors and users of heritage.
Using a series of case studies, this work will undertake new
primary research, in order to reflect directly upon professional experience and
to make use of museological and heritage theory. A series of questions will be
framed around issues of authenticity, the use and manipulation of heritage and
the purpose and integrity of the dialogue between those who use historic
resources and those who care for them. Recognising that practice within the
heritage and museum sector may always be compromised, it will seek to move the
debate further to consider why or if there will always be an accommodation to
be made, whether users of such resources can ever find an authentic experience
and whether this matters.
Should old bathrooms be conserved in some historic buildings? Charlotte Reynolds' research considers the options |
Charlotte Reynolds works as a Heritage at Risk Project Officer at Historic England and is a first-year DHeritage student. Her research examines the significance of historic bathrooms in today’s homes.
In Need of Modernisation? The place of historic toilets and bathrooms in
our homes
A cold and
unwelcoming outside toilet, and unfixed bath, are within living memory for a
declining number of older people. The addition of an indoor toilet and plumbed-in
bath, whether an earlier installation in 1840 or a later one in 1980, were a
significant investment and noteworthy change to a building, and the lives lived
in it.
Despite
being of fairly recent social and architectural history for our homes, this
change is all too easily overlooked. A decreasing number of privies and outside
WCs survive, and often little significance is given to remaining early
bathrooms. They are not usually seen as desirable ‘period features’. Once
common-place fixtures are becoming rare, within a culture that has created a
‘need’ for multiple fashionable bathrooms.
This project
considers what has driven the modernisation of facilities in the past and
present, and the impact this has had on our buildings. I am interested in where
old toilets and bathrooms survive, and how these are perceived today,
particularly within a planning and listed building context. The research addresses
my professional concerns over the lack of guidance currently available on the
heritage significance of such features, and whether, or how, to conserve or
record them.
DHeritage students at Cumberland Lodge for the University of Hertfordshire's annual Department of History conference |
Further information about the DHeritage is available on the University website and from the Programme Director, Dr Grace Lees-Maffei.
No comments:
Post a Comment